APRIL 14, 2022
The Status of Artsakh Would Be Void Under International Law
In his speech before the National Assembly on 13 April 2022, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan announced the Armenian Government’s plan to conclude a peace treaty with Azerbaijan “as soon as possible,” and indicated that the basic principles of the peace treaty might include, inter alia, recognition of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and Armenia, and a clarification of the final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh, hereinafter “Artsakh,” regarding which Armenia would “lower its benchmark.”i
We, the Board of Governors of the Armenian Bar Association (the “Board”), express our legal opinion that a treaty concluded between Armenia and Azerbaijan would be invalid, particularly as a determination of the legal status of Artsakh as a matter of international law.
First, the treaty would be unlawfully procured by Azerbaijan’s threat and actual use of force. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (“VCLT”), to which Azerbaijan and Armenia are party, provides at Article 52, “A treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or use of force in violation of the principles of international law embodied in the Charter of the United Nations.”
Two of the principles of international law concerning the use of force embodied in the Charter of the United Nations are:
• Art. 2(3) “All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.”
• Art. 2(4) “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
Prime Minister Pashinyan made clear in his speech that Armenia’s failure to rapidly acquiesce to a peace treaty with Azerbaijan with the above content demanded by Azerbaijan would lead to Azerbaijan’s renewed use of force against both Artsakh and the Republic of Armenia, presumably in Syunik.ii The facts support this fear: as confirmed by the Russian Federation peacekeeping mission, days after sending its proposal for a peace treaty, Azerbaijan’s armed forces invaded Artsakh’s Parukh village.iii Furthermore, Azerbaijani soldiers remain on the Republic of Armenia’s sovereign territory, which Azerbaijan invaded on 12 May and 16 November 2021.
Under these circumstances, any ‘peace’ treaty with Azerbaijan would have been procured by the threat of its use of force against Artsakh, in violation of Article 2(3) of the UN Charter, and against the Republic of Armenia, in violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. The treaty would be void under VCLT Art. 52.
Second, the treaty would unlawfully deprive Artsakh’s ethnically indigenous Armenian population of its right to self-determination. Article 53 of the VCLT provides, “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law.” One such peremptory norm of general international law is the right of peoples to self-determination.iv That
Any Imminent Peace Treaty Between Armenia and Azerbaijan Dictating The Status of Artsakh Would Be Invalid Under International Law April 14, 2022 Page 2
Any ImminentPeace Treaty Between Armenia and Azerbaijan DictatingThe Status of Artsakh Would Be Invalid Under International LawApril 14, 2022Page 2
right entitles them to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic,social and cultural development.”v
A treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which purports to determine the legal status of Artsakh as a subordinate part ofAzerbaijan, would deprive theArtsakh’speople of their right to self-determination, for two reasons.
•Neither Artsakh’s people nor itsgovernment is involved in the negotiation of the treaty, including in the determination of their political status.
•There is ampleevidencethat Azerbaijan would deny the people of Artsakh any meaningful sayin their economic, socialand cultural development. The government of theAzerbaijani SSR did so during Soviet times, including through its militaryresponse to the December 10, 1991 independence referendum conducted underapplicable Soviet law in which 99.89% of the voters inArtsakh cast their ballots in favor of independence, all of which precipitated the current unresolved conflict. The currentgovernment of the Republicof Azerbaijan underIlham Aliyev hasfordecades advanced State policy basedon and promoting hatred towardthe indigenous Armeniansof Artsakh, as confirmed by the findings of theUN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the European Committee on Racism and Intolerance, and the European Court ofHuman Rights.
The Board’s Recommendation
In order to be legally validunder the VCLT, a peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan mustbe concluded under thefollowing circumstances:
- Azerbaijan must, as a precondition to beginningnegotiations free of coercion, formallyrenounce the use offorce against the Republicsof Armenia and Artsakh.
- The treaty must not purport to determine the finallegal status of Artsakh, deferring such determination until such time as relations have substantially improved between the peoples ofArmenia, Azerbaijan, and Artsakh, and thegovernment of Azerbaijan hastaken credible steps todemonstrate its good faith towards the people ofArtsakh, their human rights and their dignity.
- The people ofArtsakhmust participate in the determination of the final legal status of theterritory.
i.https://www.primeminister.am/en/statements-and-messages/item /2022/04/13/ Nikol-Pashinyan-Speech/
ii.Id.(“[B]y surrendering, Imight have saved thousands of lives, but by not surrendering, I actually became the authorof decisions that resulted in thousands of victims. . . . But, dear colleagues, I amnot saying this now to start a dialogabout the past, I am saying this to start a dialog on thefuture. Because we have the same situationnow in terms ofcontent andI do not want torepeat the same mistakes.” [Emphasis added.]).
iv.See Right of peoples to self-determination–UN Special Rapporteur study, E/CN.4/Sub.2/405(vol.I)* (June 20,1978), ¶ 75, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-186956/#:~:text=In%20present %2Dday%20legal%20theory,condition%20or%20prerequisite%20for%20the.
v.International Covenant onCivil and Political Rights, Art. 1(1).